Hesse/Olson v. Sprint
Case Information
Our clients in this case sued on behalf of all Washington customers of Sprint, challenging Sprint’s practice of adding a “B and O Surcharge” to the advertised monthly price of service, in violation of Washington law. The trial court certified the case as a class action but then dismissed all claims based on a settlement agreement Sprint made in an unrelated case in Kansas. We believe this decision is wrong and have appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. A decision is not expected until 2009.
Case Documents
To view a document from this case, select from the list below: